The Federal Courts treat digital evidence as documents that carry the same burden of proof of authenticity. Digital evidence carries a further burden because copies are allowed, and because digital evidence is easy to alter in discreet ways if not handled properly. United States v. Maxwell- Search was not valid under a plain view analysis, because the warrant did not authorize the search of the specified files, and the view was obtained by opening the files, not as a result of seeing what was legitimately in “plain view”.
Posted on Tuesday, March 27th, 2007 at 7:08 pm and under category News.
You can read any responses through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can give a response, or trackback from your site.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Search
Recent Posts
- Government has foreign language deficit
- Retired Gen. James Cartwright offers a fresh view on defense
- Mitt Romney joins forces with RNC to boost fundraising
- Catching up with Katherine Harris
- Supreme Court agrees to hear case on electronic surveillance
- As Congress funds itself, winners and losers emerge
- Iowa GOP takes shot at Obama<br>with ‘natural-born citizen’ requirement
Categories
Monthly Archives
- May 2012 (616)
- April 2012 (826)
- March 2012 (928)
- February 2012 (831)
- January 2012 (930)
- December 2011 (699)
- November 2011 (622)
- October 2011 (611)
- September 2011 (726)
- August 2011 (645)
- July 2011 (740)
- June 2011 (1161)
- July 2007 (2)
- March 2007 (2047)
- February 2007 (612)